Upgradation of Lab Standard
Upgradation of Lab Standard The New ISO/IEC 17025:2017: The Refreshed Norm
The refreshed research facility certification standard reinforces necessities for fairness, risk appraisal and surveying estimation vulnerability.
As Indian Standard systems the nation over keep on developing, certification is turning out to be progressively significant. Since it gives reliable, turnkey norms and outsider check, certification is rapidly arising as a significant apparatus for controllers. For testing labs, this pattern has been particularly articulated with the expanding number of states that expect authorization to ISO/IEC 17025.
Starting around 2017 there were almost 70,000 research facilities authorize to ISO/IEC 17025, making it the absolute generally significant benchmark for testing research facilities all over the planet. ISO/IEC 17025:2005 determines the overall necessities for the capability to complete tests including examining. It covers testing performed utilizing standard techniques, non-standard strategies also, research facility created strategies.
It is appropriate to all associations performing tests including pot labs. The norm is material to all labs no matter what the quantity of work force or the degree of the extent of testing exercises. Created to advance trust in the activity of research facilities, the standard is presently being utilized as a vital essential to work as a cannabis lab in many states.
There are presently 29 states in INDIA (additionally BIMSTEC) that require clinical or grown-up use weed to be tried as of February 2019. Of those states, 29 require marijuana testing research facilities to be certify – with by far most requiring ISO/IEC 17025 authorization. States that require testing research facilities to achieve ISO/IEC 17025 certification address some of the biggest and most complex marijuana administrative designs in the nation. As a result, numerous pot testing labs are observing later changes to ISO/IEC 17025 guidelines.
ISO/IEC 17025 was first given in 1999 by the Global Association for Normalization. The standard was refreshed in 2005, and again in 2017. The latest update keeps a significant number of the inheritance principles from 2005, however adds a few parts – explicitly prerequisites for unprejudiced nature, risk evaluation and surveying estimation vulnerability. The rest of this article brings a more profound jump into these three areas of ISO/IEC 17025, and how that affects marijuana testing labs.
Objectivity is the nonattendance or goal of irreconcilable situations to forestall unfavorable effect on research facility exercises.
Unprejudiced nature
ISO/IEC 17025:2005 addressed an unprejudiced nature prerequisite, yet just momentarily. The past standard required research facilities that had a place with associations performing exercises other than testing as well as adjustment to distinguish likely struggles of interest for staff associated with testing or adjustment. It further expected that research facilities had arrangements and strategies to keep away from fairness, however that necessity was very ambiguous.
For those clients previously guaranteed by the CB, the CB ought to furnish them with the proposed courses of action for overhauling their confirmations to the freshest standard renditions. These game plans include: the means by which proceeded with confirmation will be thought of (i.e., single visit, multi stage approach, and so on), a time span for when recertification reviews should be planned, and any new necessities occupant upon the client to furnish the CB as per the new standard variants.
Kindly remember the connection between the change time of the new norms and the recertification cycle utilized by your association. It could be useful to design the following recertification review to correspond with the change time frame dates for existing clients.
To follow the new norm, all staff that could impact research center exercises should act fairly. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 likewise expects that lab the board show a promise to fair-mindedness. Be that as it may, the standard is quiet on how labs should exhibit such responsibility. As a beginning stage, some pot labs have integrated proclamations underscoring unbiasedness into their worker handbooks and requiring the board and representative preparation on distinguishing and keeping away from irreconcilable circumstances.
Risk Evaluation
Both the 2005 and 2017 forms contain the board framework necessities. A significant update to this is the necessity in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 that research facility the board frameworks integrate activities to address dangers and open doors. The new risk-based thinking in the 2017 form diminishes prescriptive necessities and consolidates execution based prerequisites.
Under ISO/IEC 17025:2017, labs should consider dangers and open doors related with directing research facility exercises. This investigation incorporates measures that guarantee that:
• The lab’s administration framework is effective;
• The lab has strategies to expand chances to accomplish its objectives and reason;
• The lab has done whatever it takes to forestall or diminish undesired results and possible disappointments;
• The lab is accomplishing generally improvement.
Labs should have the option to show how they forestall or alleviate any dangers to unprejudiced nature that they recognize.
To follow ISO/IEC 17025:2017, labs should plan and execute activities to address distinguished dangers and open doors into the board frameworks. They should likewise gauge the viability of such activities. Significantly, that’s what the standard requires the degree of chance evaluations should be relative to the effect a given risk might have on the legitimacy of the research facility’s test results.
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 doesn’t need that labs record a conventional risk the executives cycle, however labs have circumspection to foster greater strategies and cycles whenever wanted. To meet the prerequisites of the norm, activities to address chances can incorporate sharing the risk, holding the risk by informed choice, killing the gamble source, pinpointing and staying away from dangers, facing challenges to seek after an open door, and changing the probability or result of the risk.
ISO/IEC 17025:2005 addressed an unprejudiced nature prerequisite, yet just momentarily. The past standard required research facilities that had a place with associations performing exercises other than testing as well as adjustment to distinguish likely struggles of interest for staff associated with testing or adjustment. It further expected that research facilities had arrangements and strategies to keep away from fairness, however that necessity was very ambiguous.
Evaluating Estimation Vulnerability With Choice Guidelines
ISO/IEC 17025:2005 required (just where fundamental and pertinent) test result reports to incorporate a proclamation of consistence/rebelliousness with particulars and to distinguish which conditions of the detail were met or not met. Such articulations were expected to consider estimation vulnerability and assuming that estimation results and vulnerabilities were overlooked from the assertion, the lab was expected to record and keep up with the outcomes for future reference.
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 requires comparative explanations of similarity with an additional “choice rule” component. At the point when explanations of adjustment to a determination or standard are given, labs should record the choice rule it utilizes and consider the degree of risk the choice rule will have on recording misleading positive or negative experimental outcomes. Like the 2005 form, labs should incorporate proclamations of congruity in test result reports (provided that important and significant see 5.10.3.1 (b)). Presently, test result writes about explanations of congruity should incorporate the choice decide that was utilized.
Pushing Ahead
Since many states require ISO/IEC 17025 certification for authorizing, weed testing labs the nation over would be all around educated to intently screen the ramifications concerning changes in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 connected with fair-mindedness, risk appraisal furthermore, estimation vulnerability. In the event that you run a marijuana testing lab, the most effective way to guarantee consistence is training, and the best spot to advance more about the new prerequisites is from a universally perceived license body, particularly on the off chance that it is a signatory to the Worldwide Research Center License Collaboration (WRCLC) for testing labs, alignment labs and assessment offices.
The New ISO/IEC 17025:2017 – A Comprehensive Guide
The upgradation of laboratory standards has become a critical priority in today’s fast-evolving scientific, industrial, and regulatory environment. Laboratories are no longer just testing facilities—they are key pillars of quality assurance, product safety, regulatory compliance, and global trade. With increasing demand for reliable and accurate testing results, the transition to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 marks a significant milestone in strengthening laboratory systems worldwide.
This upgraded version of the standard introduces enhanced requirements for impartiality, risk-based thinking, and measurement uncertainty—making laboratories more robust, transparent, and globally aligned. In this comprehensive guide, we will explore the concept of laboratory standard upgradation, the evolution of ISO/IEC 17025, key changes in the 2017 revision, and how laboratories can effectively implement these requirements.
Understanding ISO/IEC 17025: The Foundation of Laboratory Excellence
ISO/IEC 17025 is the internationally recognized standard that specifies the general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Developed by the International Organization for Standardization in collaboration with the International Electrotechnical Commission, it ensures that laboratories operate competently and generate valid, reliable results.
First published in 1999, revised in 2005, and most recently updated in 2017, ISO/IEC 17025 has evolved to meet modern laboratory practices and technological advancements.
The standard applies to all organizations performing laboratory activities, regardless of size, complexity, or sector. This includes:
- Testing laboratories
- Calibration laboratories
- Research and development labs
- Government and regulatory labs
- Private and commercial labs
Why Upgradation of Laboratory Standards is Essential
As industries grow more complex and regulatory frameworks tighten, laboratory accreditation is becoming increasingly mandatory rather than optional. The upgradation to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 offers several benefits:
1. Enhanced Credibility and Trust
Accreditation demonstrates that a laboratory operates competently and produces valid results, increasing trust among customers, regulators, and stakeholders.
2. Global Recognition
Accredited laboratories gain international acceptance of their test results through mutual recognition arrangements such as those governed by the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation.
3. Regulatory Compliance
Many industries and governments now require ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation as a prerequisite for operation.
4. Improved Operational Efficiency
The updated standard emphasizes risk-based thinking and process optimization, helping labs reduce errors and improve performance.
Key Changes in ISO/IEC 17025:2017
The 2017 revision introduces several structural and conceptual changes compared to the 2005 version. These changes align the standard with modern quality management principles and other ISO standards like ISO 9001.
1. Process-Based Approach
The updated standard adopts a process-based structure, making it easier to integrate with other management systems.
2. Greater Flexibility
Laboratories now have more flexibility in implementing requirements, allowing customization based on their operations.
3. Integration with Risk-Based Thinking
Risk management is now a core requirement, replacing preventive action concepts.
Impartiality: Ensuring Objectivity in Laboratory Operations
One of the most critical additions in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the strengthened requirement for impartiality.
What is Impartiality?
Impartiality refers to the absence of conflicts of interest that could influence laboratory results. Laboratories must ensure that their activities are objective and unbiased.
Key Requirements:
- Identification of risks to impartiality
- Elimination or mitigation of conflicts of interest
- Commitment from top management
- Continuous monitoring of impartiality risks
Laboratories must demonstrate that all personnel involved in testing or calibration act without bias. This includes both internal staff and external stakeholders.
Practical Implementation:
- Develop impartiality policies
- Include impartiality clauses in employee contracts
- Conduct regular training on ethical practices
- Maintain records of conflict-of-interest assessments
Risk-Based Thinking: A Modern Approach to Laboratory Management
The introduction of risk-based thinking is a transformative change in ISO/IEC 17025:2017.
What is Risk-Based Thinking?
It involves identifying potential risks and opportunities that could impact laboratory operations and taking proactive measures to address them.
Key Objectives:
- Ensure consistent and valid results
- Prevent errors and failures
- Improve decision-making
- Enhance overall performance
Examples of Risks:
- Equipment failure
- Human error
- Environmental conditions
- Data integrity issues
Risk Management Strategies:
- Risk identification and assessment
- Risk mitigation planning
- Monitoring and review
- Continuous improvement
Unlike previous versions, the 2017 standard does not mandate a formal risk management system. However, laboratories must demonstrate that risks are effectively managed.
Measurement Uncertainty: Strengthening Accuracy and Reliability
Measurement uncertainty is a critical concept in laboratory testing and calibration.
What is Measurement Uncertainty?
It refers to the doubt that exists about the result of any measurement. No measurement is completely exact, and uncertainty quantifies the range within which the true value lies.
Key Updates in ISO/IEC 17025:2017:
- Mandatory evaluation of measurement uncertainty where applicable
- Inclusion of uncertainty in test reports when relevant
- Use of decision rules for conformity assessment
Decision Rules Explained:
Decision rules define how measurement uncertainty is considered when determining compliance with specifications.
For example, a product may pass or fail a test depending on how uncertainty is accounted for. Laboratories must clearly document and communicate these rules.
Management System Requirements: A Flexible Framework
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 offers two options for management systems:
Option A:
Direct compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 requirements
Option B:
Alignment with ISO 9001
This flexibility allows laboratories to integrate their quality management systems with existing frameworks.
Transitioning from ISO/IEC 17025:2005 to 2017
Upgrading to the 2017 version requires careful planning and execution.
Steps for Transition:
- Gap Analysis
Identify differences between current practices and new requirements - Training and Awareness
Educate staff on new concepts like risk-based thinking and impartiality - Documentation Update
Revise policies, procedures, and records - Implementation
Apply new processes and controls - Internal Audit
Verify compliance with updated requirements - Accreditation Assessment
Undergo evaluation by an accreditation body
Role of Accreditation Bodies
Accreditation bodies play a crucial role in ensuring compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.
They:
- Assess laboratory competence
- Conduct audits and surveillance
- Provide certification and recognition
Choosing an accreditation body recognized by international organizations ensures global acceptance of results.
Challenges in Upgrading Laboratory Standards
While the benefits are significant, laboratories may face challenges during transition:
1. Resource Constraints
Limited budget and manpower
2. Lack of Awareness
Insufficient understanding of new requirements
3. Documentation Complexity
Updating procedures and records
4. Cultural Resistance
Resistance to change among staff
Solutions:
- Invest in training programs
- Use digital tools for documentation
- Engage leadership support
- Seek expert consultancy
Industry Applications of ISO/IEC 17025:2017
The upgraded standard is widely applicable across industries:
- Pharmaceuticals
- Food and agriculture
- Environmental testing
- Construction materials
- Oil and gas
- Cannabis testing laboratories
In highly regulated sectors, compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 is often mandatory.
Future Trends in Laboratory Accreditation
The future of laboratory standards will be shaped by:
1. Digital Transformation
Automation and data analytics
2. Remote Auditing
Virtual assessments and inspections
3. Sustainability
Green laboratory practices
4. Global Harmonization
Increased alignment of international standards
Best Practices for Successful Implementation
To successfully upgrade laboratory standards, organizations should:
- Establish strong leadership commitment
- Foster a culture of quality and integrity
- Continuously monitor performance
- Engage in regular training and development
- Maintain clear and transparent documentation
Conclusion: Moving Towards Excellence
The upgradation of laboratory standards to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is not just a compliance requirement—it is a strategic move towards excellence, reliability, and global competitiveness.
By focusing on impartiality, risk management, and measurement uncertainty, laboratories can significantly enhance their credibility and operational efficiency. As regulatory requirements continue to evolve, staying aligned with international standards will be essential for long-term success.
Table of Contents
Branches
WYAB Accreditation
WYAB Head Office
WYAB World Yoga Accreditation Board
WYAB House
C/O Mr.Garry 54, Glengarnock Avenue,
E-14 3BP Isle Of Dogs, London UK
Tel .: +44-8369083940
email: info@worldyoga.us
Website: https://worldyoga.us/
MUMBAI Head Office
World Yoga Accreditation Board (WYAB)
WYAB House
B-401, New Om Kaveri Chs. Ltd., Nagindas pada,
Next To Shiv Sena Office, Nallasopara (E)
Tel .: +91-7499991895
email: info@worldyoga.us
Website: https://worldyoga.us/
DELHI-NCR Regd. Office
World Yoga Accreditation Board (WYAB)
WYAB House
Asaoti, Dist Palwal
Faridabad Delhi NCR, Haryana
Tel .: +91-7979801035
Fax: +91-250 2341170
Website: https://worldyoga.us/
